Most educators around the world are currently committed to creating “authentic” assessments. A way to measure students’ learning in a “real life” way.
But here are some examples of authentic assessments I have seen or heard about:
“pretend you are a designer”
“imagine you write for a magazine”
I began to wonder… if we are asking students to pretend to be or do something in their “authentic” assessment, isn’t that by nature inauthentic?
So I looked up the definition of the word “authentic”…
and the word “inauthentic”…
It seems like if we are asking our students to do something that is not real, accurate, true or sincere then it’s not really authentic. We’re merely mimicking what happens in the real world, without allowing our students to participate in or contribute to the actual real world.
I’m not discounting that these types of assessment tasks are an improvement from traditional tests and quizzes, but calling them “authentic” might be a bit of a stretch. I think if we are asking students to pretend to be or do something, then that’s quasi-authentic or pseudo-authentic at best.
Should we settle for quasi or psuedo-authentic tasks? Or should we be aiming for truly authentic ways for students to demonstrate their learning and apply new skills?
I vote the latter.
In this day and age, with the help of technology, students don’t need to pretend to be bloggers, magazine writers, podcasters, advocates, speakers, inventors, creators, designers, teachers, publishers….
they can actually be and do those things. Authentically.
Making Good Humans 